Score: 0

"No, just no."

submission: CC06 Medly

date: August 15, 2006

Next time, don't bother IM'ing me and telling me to vote 5 on such a flash. I don't even vote well when somebody IM's me to vote, let alone when I am IM'd to vote on something like this. Don't waste my time.

Score: 2

"No. Just No."

submission: Hacker vs. Hacker (short)

date: March 7, 2006

Not only did you rip off the Hackers movie, but you did it in a way that artually attempted to demean the movie, as well as white/red hat (Which ever you prefer to use) hackers out there. If you are going to do a Hackers film, make sure it has the right message in it, and do it with better graphics. I am offended to have even watched this.

Score: 2

"Huh?"

submission: A Very MCTV Christmas

date: February 12, 2006

I stopped watching after 3 min of almost nothing hapening. What the hell was the point of it? I am sorry to say I could not give you a good vote on this one. If there was a point to it, it should have been evidant sooner so the viewer did not get board.

And don't discriminate against ones nationality (in your reply to a review). You are just being gay by doing that. This may soynd like I am just defending Canada, as I am Canadian, but I am not. I hold a visable nutral position when it comes to stuff like nationality, religion and opionions. One is not necessarily better than the other and everybody is entitled te beleive as they wish.

Score: 4

"Lets Solve This."

submission: History of fuck!

date: January 29, 2006

Ok, let me put this all together for you. The audio is not stolen from another flash. The audio is a peice by MontyPython. There have been in the past, flash videos that use this peice of audio for creating the same thing as this though. Therefor, there is no need to report this submission for being stolen, as it is not.

As for the author. I think you should have spent more time on this, and it could have actually been good. Right now, it is very bad. You hardly did anything, and were just relying on the audio being good enough to make people like it. I hope fou redo this, and actually put sowe effort inho it.

You should all know now that this audio is NOT stolen. he put in his credits that he did not make the audio, but he did not know who made it (which he, and you now do). I don't want to hear anything about the audio being stolen anymore.

Score: 7

"A good Claymation?"

submission: Sheets!

date: November 6, 2005

Wow, an actuall calymation that I found to be good. It would apear that you put allot of hard work into this, and the charicters didn't just stand there. You even made their eyes move, and blink occasionally. Good job man. Keep it up.

Score: 7

"Finish the sentences"

submission: Stefans Adventure

date: October 28, 2005

This looked like it would be cool, but why in the hell did you not finish the sentences. That just pissed me off.

Score: 6

"Not bad"

submission: A diary of an unborn kid.

date: September 7, 2005

" You're the saviour! You are one of a number of people who have helped keep this entry in the Portal!" I think you did an ok job on that. Keep up the good work. However for future if you do anything with that sort of BG(the woom) instead of making it look scratchy with all the brush lines going back and forth, i'd try to so somthing else.

Score: 10

"Very nice"

submission: July 4th Minigame

date: July 10, 2005

I see all thes people saying the game was "too hard". Well what is a game that you dont have to really work to get the best score? I think you guy's did a very nice job. I wouldn't have this game any other way.

Score: 7

"Could have had more"

submission: Alone In My Room

date: July 5, 2005

I liked that indeed. But it could have been better if you made him do more stuff than just that loop of actions. But still good over all

Score: 9

"I very much liked"

submission: Tink's Tutorial Vol. 1

date: July 5, 2005

Even though i don't do flash, i liked that tutorial. It wasnt plain and boring. However i found you sometimes talked to fast, and didnt let the user digest what you just said. and the text went by to fast even though i know you sole puopse wanst for the user to read that first time arround. Work on those things and i think you will be able to make even better tutorails. Can't wait for the next one.